If you are happy with the sound of the Origami vs the Ekos SE, then I would still go with the Linn platform. Linn charges a lot for their Radikal D upgrade, for very good reason There is a variable here that occurs to me. I believe IF you had done that.and the system was resolving enough, the difference would have been very obvious and as extreme as I am describing! You heard a snippet of the reproduction when you went to hear the Radikal, and most likely did not AB against your Lingo at the same time. With a more resolving cartridge as the final step, all of the benefits of the Radikal become even more evident! So, if your amps or preamp, or speaker synergy, aren’t up to the task, this aspect will probably go unnoticed!
This isn’t quite as noticeable until everything else in the system is dialed in. Lastly, we have the biggest improvements in my experience.the increase in overall dynamics.
It is then that you begin to hear the many differences.as more and more LP’s hit the platter! So, IME, the Radikal D brings the following: much greater inner detail, speed accuracy that increases imaging precision and timbre reproduction. I replaced my Valhalla with the Radikal D.a huge upgrade! But here’s the thing, like many large improvements, the actual sum of the improvement isn’t that obvious until after a little time has gone by. The Linn protocol is to upgrade from the inside out.so the power supply first, then the sub chassis then the arm and cartridge last.
0 kommentar(er)
